CM-22 Change Management

Post-Implementation Review

Outcomes and controls are validated after release.

Domain
Change Management
Control type
Detective
Automated / manual
Manual
Frequency
Per project
Framework reference
COBIT BAI07.08

What good looks like

PIRs assess whether objectives, benefits and control expectations were met.

Risk if it fails

Recurring project/control failures.

How Tess tests it

2 tests — each concludes only on cited evidence.

PIR process defined

Design
Procedure
Inspect the process.
Expected
Defined.
Sample
1 (design inspection)
Evidence
PIR report, action items.

PIR performed for sampled project

Operating
Procedure
Inspect the PIR.
Expected
Conducted; actions tracked.
Sample
Judgmental, by population (e.g. 10–25)
Evidence
PIR report, action items.

Evidence Tess looks for

PIR report, action items.

More in Change Management

Want Tess to test CM-22 against your evidence?

Book a demo